3/28 RRC But two months have passed and still in this state, waiting makes people anxious

(0) 讚！ | 渣渣小芭蕉

Have you made any progress? Mine has been with the editor for over ten days

(0) 讚！ | 吉吉和大熊

under review. So fast. My two weeks are still in the hands of the editor

(0) 讚！ | 吉吉和大熊

23.11.6 Submission
23.11.8 with editor
23.11.10 under review
23.12.27 Minor revisions
24.1.11 Revision
24.4.19 Reminder
24.4.21 Accept

(0) 讚！ | 123

It has been two months since the manuscript status (Required Reviews Completed), why is there generally no message??? Has anyone experienced this situation?

(1) 讚！ | King

The time with the editor has clearly become longer now. It used to take about a week for the submission to be under review, but now it has been over ten days and it is still with the editor

(0) 讚！ | 武痴马保国

Now the articles are generally slow, so we can only wait patiently

(0) 讚！ | 渣渣小芭蕉

It took 5 months to submit for review, why is it so slow now? ??

(0) 讚！ | 坐看流年轻度

3/06/2024 under review Praying for good luck

(0) 讚！ | 渣渣小芭蕉

10/27/2023 submitted
11/06/2023 with editor
It's been four months, still with editor, the processing speed is a bit slow

(4) 讚！ | 渣渣小芭蕉

2024.1.16 submitted
2024.1.17 with editor
No update on the status until now, is this journal so slow

(0) 讚！ | B.Bo

Now it's in the top position, this is recognition for MPG, a well-established oil journal, much better developed than AAPG, hopefully a piece will be accepted

(2) 讚！ | 地质小袁

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(211) 讚！ | 李朴实

The quality of the journal is very good. After submission, there are two reviewers who review the manuscript, and after making relevant revisions and answering related questions, it is directly accepted for publication. The whole process of submission to acceptance takes about half a year. It is worth submitting to, and the impact factor is also increasing.

(0) 讚！ | 小王12106

Submitted in March 2022, accepted in January 2023. Two rounds of revisions. The editor is very responsible. As a well-established journal in petroleum geology, it has a high level of recognition within the industry.

(0) 讚！ | 小蜗牛的巧克力

From submission to acceptance, it took about 5 months. The journal has a fast speed, as it was accepted the day after revision. MAPG, as a high-quality journal in petroleum geology, has a relatively high acceptance rate.

(1) 讚！ | 武痴马保国

Second submission, no news for 4 months after the initial review, reminded the editor and received feedback the next day. Minor revisions took 10 days, and it was resubmitted. Due to the holidays, it was accepted 3 days later. The reviewer was very meticulous, and the editor worked quickly.

(8) 讚！ | Dr.

The formatting requirements are very high, and the language requirements are also very high.

Before submission, the formatting was modified twice, and the language was modified three times. Even after being polished by the Elsevier Plus editing service, the article still could not meet the requirements (which has never happened before when submitting to other journals). Finally, the editor highlighted all the parts that were not smooth in expression or had inaccurate wording, and downloaded the edited paper to correct the specialized vocabulary one by one. It took a total of 4 months.

After submission, it went relatively smoothly. After receiving feedback from two reviewers and making major revisions, the reviewers agreed to accept it! Then the editor asked for language polishing again... Fortunately, it was eventually accepted!

Overall, the efficiency of the journal is very high. They quickly respond after submission, and the editor is very responsible. The editor is well-known in the same industry, and the reviewers' comments are very professional. However, the language requirements are really high. It feels like the whole submission process is focused on the language. I once thought about withdrawing the submission, but the editor always said that the article was good but needed language modifications... The final result was still good, it was accepted! The field is sedimentology.

P.S. One of the reviewers provided a 6,000-word review in the first round, including a lot of discussions that were not very relevant to the article. It was almost like chatting about life and ideals. But the response in the second round was just one sentence saying they agreed to publish, and I still don't understand what happened!

(5) 讚！ | tianyingzuo

March 1, 2021 - Posted
May 20, 2021 - Rejected
June 23, 2021 - Re-submitted
November 16, 2021 - Modified
November 22, 2021 - Returned with revision suggestions, hoping for good luck in posting.

(12) 讚！ | NCS多多来

Submitted in March, underwent one round of revisions, and accepted after another round of modifications; the whole process took 7 months.

(15) 讚！ | 我冲冲冲

The review process is quick, the reviewers are very professional, and the quality has greatly improved after the revisions.

(2) 讚！ | Dr.

Before submitting, carefully complete the manuscript according to the requirements. Some formatting details are not specifically stated in the guideline. After submission, the manuscript will be returned for formatting revisions within approximately 30 days in the hands of the editor. After making the required changes, resubmitting is necessary. The editor has been changed, but there have been no changes in the past 10 days. I hope the article can be reviewed and good suggestions can be provided for the content.

(2) 讚！ | TTZZ

1 and a half months with the editor, 1 month for review, 2 minor revisions, and 20 days to make changes. It will be directly accepted half a month later. The overall quality of MPG is decent, but there are also some filler articles. The impact factor is expected to exceed 4. In conclusion, it can be considered as a good journal in the second quartile.

(0) 讚！ | bowen

The review process was fast, with only two minor revisions required before the paper was accepted for publication. However, I am dissatisfied with the typesetting as two minor issues occurred during the publishing process.

(8) 讚！ | Wenbin

One week with the editor; one and a half months for review; two major revisions and one minor revision; submit after modifications and get directly accepted.

(3) 讚！ | haoshihaocc