Brother, how long have you been waiting for the status of your reviewer assignment to change to pending? Thank you!

(0) 讚！ | bright19936666

From 2023.10.28 to 2024.1.14, it has been in Reviewer Assignment Pending status. How about yours? Any changes?

(0) 讚！ | yyl@

Surprised, may I ask if there has been any progress with your article? I submitted it on December 6th, so it should still be in the hands of the editor

(0) 讚！ | GTZHANG

Submitted on 10.28, the status date is still stuck on 10.30 after one and a half months, always in Reviewer Assignment Pending status

(0) 讚！ | yyl@

Research Purpose, Process, and Findings: The purpose of this research was to investigate the impact of social media usage on mental health. The research process involved collecting data from a sample of 500 participants and analyzing their social media usage patterns and mental health indicators. The findings revealed a significant association between excessive social media use and symptoms of anxiety and depression.

Discussion of Data Results: These results are consistent with previous studies that have also found a link between social media use and poor mental health outcomes. For example, Smith et al. (2018) reported similar findings in their study on the effects of social media on well-being. These findings suggest that there is a need for further research on the relationship between social media and mental health.

Evaluation and Discussion of Research Contribution: This research makes a valuable contribution to the literature on social media and mental health by providing empirical evidence of the negative effects of excessive social media use. Understanding these effects is important for developing interventions to promote mental well-being in social media users.

Conclusion: In conclusion, this study highlights the detrimental impact of excessive social media use on mental health. Future research should focus on identifying strategies to mitigate these negative effects and promote healthier social media usage habits

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Contrary to the introduction, the writing in the discussion section takes on a reverse funnel shape, gradually expanding from smaller to larger points. Starting from the plausibility of each research result, any anomalies, and the principles behind them, a thorough analysis is conducted, leading naturally to the main findings of the paper for discussion. Finally, the analysis is further expanded to highlight the importance/significance/universality/application value of the study

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to write about it?

(0) 讚！ | 平原文波

What is the difference between an introduction and a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 陶宜三岁啦

Is the review process fast? I published SCI20141902, SCI20152046, and SCI20161959 last year. It's frustrating that I had over 2 points last year and now I only have just over 1 point. Do I have to lower it even more next year? Who would be willing to invest in it?

(0) 讚！ | 蓉沼温书

It's frustrating that I scored over 2 points on my paper last year, but only just over 1 point this year. Will it decrease even more next year? Who would want to invest in it!

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁