Review Speed: 1.0
Research Focus: Urological tumors
Experience sharing: This journal is very garbage, no wonder it was founded by Indians. I wrote a clinical study on prostate cancer, it seems that there was only one reviewer, and it was rejected. The reason given was to submit to a urology or oncology journal. Then the editor also rejected it. The official website clearly states that articles from urology and oncology are accepted. How can they reject it for this reason? The reviewer who rejected it is not even from urology or oncology, and the editorial department is also incompetent. The reviewer is also a der, if it's not in your field, just decline the review invitation, don't reject it, it wasted so much of my time.

(0) 讚！ | 春莉酱大魔王

Do you need it? I want to make a retrospective

(0) 讚！ | Lydia Anne

Do retrospective studies require clinical trial registration numbers?

(0) 讚！ | 白云听春

Why can't I find the article that has been accepted by Z on PubMed?

(0) 讚！ | Everley Vincent

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Emphasized research direction: General Surgery
Experience sharing: Submitted in September, revised in December, accepted in January of the following year, and published in February. No page fees for copyright. My first SCI paper, very excited and grateful

(0) 讚！ | 暴风素洁

Have you ever encountered this situation? I received the acceptance letter from him that he needed you to reply to. When I replied, the system actually bounced the email back to me

(0) 讚！ | 沃克沃德豪斯

Do you need to pay for the layout fee?

(0) 讚！ | Everley Vincent

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0 Experience sharing

(0) 讚！ | 是你的语蓉呀

It is still necessary for us to clearly explain the limitations of the research in the paper, and to explain how these limitations affect the conclusions of the paper, so that reviewers and other readers can understand that we have fully considered the limitations of the research. Discussing the limitations of the research in the discussion section generally makes the article more credible. Thinking about how to overcome these limitations in future research will have a positive effect

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Hello, may I ask how long it took for you to review? I haven't received any feedback after three months of rework

(0) 讚！ | Everley Vincent

We suggest dividing discussions on research limitations into three parts: (1) identifying research limitations; (2) explaining research limitations in detail; and (3) proposing future research directions or improvement suggestions. Following this order to discuss research limitations can help you clearly point out the research shortcomings without compromising the quality and validity of the study

(0) 讚！ | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Is it necessary to clarify the limitations of the article in the discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 修然小公主

How to write about limitations in a discussion?

(0) 讚！ | 魂魄彦露

Hello everyone, I submitted an article and they are asking for proof from the ethics committee. Is there a template for this? Thank you

(0) 讚！ | 火焰端懿

The magazine requires peer review for submissions. How should I proceed?

(0) 讚！ | 暴风素洁

As long as we can maintain the journals indexed in SCI, it will be fine. If the school adopts CiteScore for evaluation in the future, there is no need to worry. On one hand, CiteScore covers a wider range of journals, so our journal is definitely included. Additionally, it benefits smaller journals, so the difference between them is not so great. I hope the school adopts CiteScore

(0) 讚！ | 凌霄高洁

Review Speed: 12.0 | Submission Hit Rate: 50.0
Experience Sharing: Submitted in March 2016, underwent major revisions once, minor revisions once, and was accepted at the end of 2016

(0) 讚！ | 璃沙洛妃

It has been one year since the review, and it is still under review. When will it be completed?

(0) 讚！ | Alexander Bacon

The review period is too long!!

(0) 讚！ | 桃花傲儿

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Experience sharing: Indian magazines, relatively good

(0) 讚！ | 玉书姑娘